ta evidencia praveze s tym sokratom vobec nie je porovnatelna, pretoze o sokratovi sa toho vie ovela viac, jeho zivot je popisany presnejsie a viacerymi zdrojmi, skratka existuje mnozstvo pramenov, ktore vzajomnym porovnanim davaju celkom stravitelny obraz sokrata.
jezis sa udajne narodil o cca 400 rokov neskor. uz len vdaka tomu, co za ten cas stihol rim, by som ocakaval presnejsiu dokumentaciu, ale ona je prave este menej kvalitna a plna sporov. niekolko historikov, od ktorych by si zmienku o jezisovi cakal, pretoze asi malo ist o vyznamnu osobu, sa o nom nezmienuju vobec. nie je jasne ani kedy ani komu sa mal narodit a uz vobec nie kedy.
takze ak je pravdepodobne, ze jezis nazaretsky existoval, tak jedine preto, ze v tom case a tej oblasti bolo toto meno podobne neobvykle ako u nas jozef slovak.
Staci wiki?
Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed.[9][10] While the quest for the historical Jesus has produced little agreement on the historicity of gospel narratives and their theological assertions of his divinity,[11][12] most scholars agree that Jesus was a Jewish teacher from Galilee in Roman Judea, was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman Prefect, Pontius Pilate.[4][13][10]
Ja si myslim, ze na Sokratov zivot neexistuje mnozstvo zdrojov (Aristofanes sa nerata a okrem neho tak Platon a Xenofon) Mame este nieco poriadne? Ja neviem o ziadnom takom zdroji - v porovnani s takymito priamymi zdrojmi, mi pride, ze Jezis je na tom podobne, ale ok.
EDIT: Este takto.
Michael Grant (a classicist) states that "In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary." in Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels by Michael Grant 2004 ISBN 1898799881 page 200
Richard A. Burridge states: "There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church’s imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more." in Jesus Now and Then by Richard A. Burridge and Graham Gould (Apr 1, 2004) ISBN 0802809774 page 34
Robert M. Price (an atheist who denies existence) agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars: Robert M. Price "Jesus at the Vanishing Point" in The Historical Jesus: Five Views edited by James K. Beilby & Paul Rhodes Eddy, 2009 InterVarsity, ISBN 028106329X page 61
James D. G. Dunn "Paul's understanding of the death of Jesus" in Sacrifice and Redemption edited by S. W. Sykes (Dec 3, 2007) Cambridge University Press ISBN 052104460X pages 35–36 states that the theories of non-existence of Jesus are "a thoroughly dead thesis"
To neznamena, ze musel existovat, len sa mi zda, ze existuje siroky konsenzus na tom, ze existoval.
